Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Medicina (B.Aires) ; 73(5): 411-416, oct. 2013. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-708526

ABSTRACT

Procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as a marker of infection, a frequent complication in hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed PCT levels in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, assessed its correlation with inflammatory and nutritional markers and propose a PCT reference value for non-infected HD patients.In an observational cross-sectional study, 48 chronic HD patients and 36 controls were analyzed. Variables: age, gender, time on HD; diabetes; vascular access, PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, malnutrition inflammatory score (MIS), hematocrit, leukocyte count, and body mass index (BMI). Subsequently, control (G1, n = 36, 43%) vs. non-infected patients (G2, n = 48, 57%) groups were compared. In control subjects (G1), age: 54.3 ± 13.7 years, range (r): 30-81; males: 19 (53%); median PCT 0.034 ng/ml (r: 0.02-0.08); median CRP 0.80 mg/dl (r: 0.36-3.9); p95 PCT level: 0.063 ng/ml. In G2, age: 60.2 ± 15.2 years; males 32 (67%), time on HD: 27.0 ± 24.4; diabetics: 19 (32%); median PCT: 0.26 ng/ml (r: 0.09-0.82); CRP: 1.1 mg/dl (r: 0.5-6.2); p95 PCT level: 0.8 ng/ml. In control subjects, PCT and CRP were significantly lower than in G2: PCT: 0.034 vs. 0.26 ng/ml, p = 0.0001; CRP: 0.8 vs. 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004. PCT-CRP correlation in G2: ρ = 0.287, p = 0.048. PCT and CRP concentrations are elevated in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, independently of infection, diabetes and vascular access. A p95 PCT level of 0.8 ng/ml may be considered as the upper normal reference value in non-acutely infected HD subjects. The PCT cut-off level in HD is yet to be determined in HD.


La procalcitonina (PCT) puede ser un marcador de infección en la hemodiálisis (HD). Analizamos los niveles de PCT en sujetos sin infección aguda en HD crónica, su correlación con marcadores inflamatorios y nutricionales y, de acuerdo a ello, proponemos niveles de referencia de PCT. En un estudio observacional transversal se estudiaron 48 pacientes en HD y 36 controles. Variables: edad; sexo, tiempo en HD; diabetes; acceso vascular, PCT, proteína C-reactiva (PCR), albúmina, score de malnutrición-inflamación, hematocrito, recuento leucocitario, e índice de masa muscular (IMC). En los controles se determinaron PCT y PCR. Se comparó grupo control (G1, n = 36, 43%) vs. pacientes (G2, n = 48, 57%). G1: edad, 54.3 ± 13.7, rango (r): 30-81 años; hombres: 19 (53%); PCT mediana: 0.034 ng/ml (r: 0.020-0.080); PCR mediana: 0.8 mg/dl (r: 0.36-3.9); el nivel p95 de PCT: 0.063 ng/ml. En el G2, edad media 60.2 ± 15.2 años, hombres: 32 (66%), tiempo en HD: 27.0 2 4.4; diabéticos: 19 (32%); PCT: 0.26 ng/ml (r: 0.09-0.82); PCR: 1.1 mg/dl (r: 0.5-6.2); p95 PCT: 0.8 ng/ml. En G1 los niveles de PCT y PCR fueron significativamente más bajos que en G2: PCT: 0.034 vs. 0.26 ng/ml, p = 0.0001; PCR: 0.8 vs 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004. Correlación PCT- PCR en G2: ρ = 0.287, p = 0.048. La PCT y la PCR están elevadas en HD crónica independientemente de infección, diabetes y acceso vascular. Se propone p95 de PCT de 0.8 ng/ml como límite superior del intervalo de referencia en sujetos sin infección aguda en HD. El valor de PCT en HD está por determinarse.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Calcitonin/blood , Protein Precursors/blood , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Vasculitis/blood , Age Factors , Bacterial Infections/blood , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Nutritional Status , Predictive Value of Tests , Reference Values , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Vasculitis/etiology
2.
Medicina (B.Aires) ; 71(1): 66-72, ene.-feb. 2011.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-633823

ABSTRACT

La malnutrición calórico-proteica y la inflamación suelen ser condiciones comunes y concurrentes en pacientes con hemodiálisis crónica, asociándose ambas a mal pronóstico. La hiporexia y el hipercatabolismo son características comunes y frecuentes. Se ha sugerido que la primera es secundaria a la inflamación. Si bien la evidencia no es concluyente, se ha acuñado el término síndrome complejo de malnutrición e inflamación para englobar esta situación clínica, independientemente de la causa originaria. Posibles causas de este síndrome incluyen diferentes comorbilidades, estrés oxidativo, pérdida de nutrientes a través de la diálisis, hiporexia, toxinas urémicas, elevación de citoquinas inflamatorias, sobrecarga de volumen, hiperfosfatemia, subdiálisis, entre otros. Se cree que en este síndrome la resistencia a la eritropoyetina, promueve la enfermedad aterosclerótica, disminuyendo la calidad de vida e incrementando el tiempo de internación y la mortalidad. Este síndrome origina un bajo índice de masa corporal, hipocolesterolemia, sarcopenia e hipocreatininemia, e hipohomocisteinemia, paradójicamente incrementando el riesgo cardiovascular. A este fenómeno se lo ha denominado "epidemiología reversa". Por lo tanto, y dentro de ciertos límites, la obesidad, la hipercolesterolemia, el incremento de la creatinina y de la homocisteína jugarían un rol protector, asociándose a mejor pronóstico. No existe consenso sobre cómo determinar la gravedad del síndrome complejo de malnutrición e inflamación, su abordaje y su tratamiento. En este trabajo se discuten varias herramientas diagnósticas y modalidades de tratamiento. El correcto manejo de este cuadro podría disminuir en última instancia la enfermedad cardiovascular, principal causa de óbito en esta población.


Protein-energy wasting (PEW) and inflammation are usually common and concurrent conditions in maintenance dialysis patients and associated with poor prognosis. Low appetite and hypercatabolic states are common features. In dialysis patients, the former has been suggested to be secondary to inflammation; however, the evidence is not conclusive. Hence, the term malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome (MICS) was coined to include this clinical entity, regardless the original causes. Possible causes of MICS include comorbid illnesses, oxidative stress, nutrient loss through dialysis, hyporexia, uremic toxins, decreased clearance of inflammatory cytokines, volume overload, increased blood phosphate and dialysis-related factors. MICS is believed to be the main cause of erythropoietin hypo-responsiveness, cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease, decreased quality of life, hospitalization and increased mortality in dialysis patients. Because MICS leads to a low body mass index, hypocholesterolemia, decrease in muscle mass, hypocreatininemia and hypohomocysteinemia, a "reverse epidemiology" phenomenon of cardiovascular risk factors can occur in dialysis patients. Therefore, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and increased blood levels of creatinine and homocysteine, within certain limits, appear to be protective and paradoxically associated with a better outcome. There is no consensus about how to determine the degree of severity of MICS or how to manage it. Several diagnostic tools and treatment modalities are discussed in this paper. The correct management of MICS may diminish the cardiovascular disease, main cause of death in this population.


Subject(s)
Humans , Inflammation/etiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Protein-Energy Malnutrition/etiology , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Risk Factors , Syndrome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL